According to the Federal Communications Commission, there were 19,646,758 wireless subscribers in Texas at the end of 2007.
El Paso, Texas topped the U.S. in texting rates with 57% of phone users over 18 sending texts compared to the national average of 48%. Read more
Many cities in Texas, including Houston, offer the option of paying for parking meter time through an account linked to a user’s mobile phone. Read more
In the key areas of education, public safety, and healthcare, wireless services give the people of Texas twenty-first century tools to address twenty-first century issues. Wireless broadband facilitates distance learning. Public safety officials now use multiple forms of wireless communication to connect and alert those in danger. Mobile health monitoring can effectively help manage health conditions, such as diabetes and asthma, and reduce the number of visits to the doctor.
Texan rural communities face many of the same concerns as urban and suburban areas however, many of those issues can be more complex. Thankfully, today’s telecommunications systems eliminate many of the barriers set by distance and connect consumers in remote areas to the information superhighway.
The House Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the Internet held a legislative hearing yesterday on H.R. 3125, the Radio Spectrum Inventory Act, and H.R. 3019, the Spectrum Relocation Improvement Act of 2009. Both bills have bipartisan support and Subcommittee Chairman Rick Boucher stated his intention to move the bills through Congress as soon as possible.
The Radio Spectrum Inventory Act (H.R. 3125) would require an inventory of the spectrum bands managed by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration and the Federal Communications Commission. The bill was introduced by Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman and currently has 17 Cosponsors. The Spectrum Relocation Improvement Act (H.R. 3019) would amend the National Telecommunications and Information Administration Organization Act to improve the process of reallocation of spectrum from Federal Government use to commercial uses. This bill was introduced by Congressman Jay Inslee and currently has 10 Cosponsors.
The witnesses at the committee hearing included:
Michael Calabrese - Vice President and Director, Wireless Future Program, New America Foundation
Dale Hatfield - Adjunct Professor, Interdisciplinary Telecommunications Program, University of Colorado at Boulder
Ray Johnson, Ph.D., Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, Lockheed Martin Corporation
Steve Largent, President and CEO, CTIA - The Wireless Association
Thomas Stroup, Chief Executive Officer, Shared Spectrum Company
Last Friday ushered in the holiday shopping season, and while
consumers were clamoring for the best bargain, this year they had a new
tool in their artillery - their cell phone.
With an array of smartphone choices from the Palm Pre to the iPhone,
several new Blackberry models, and the Droid - never before have
Americans had so many options at their disposal. That's not to mention
the proliferation of retail m-commerce sites, and applications that can
help you navigate stores, compare prices and even send coupons straight to your mobile phone. For customers, cell phones have become the ultimate aid in savvy shopping.
The Wall Street Journal reported that on Black Friday, "mobile online payments through PayPal surged 650%" and mobile searches grew to 200,000 from around 5,000 in 2008.
This is good news for retailers, but more importantly it signals that
2009 is likely to be seen as a tipping point for the mobile web.
Today, nearly 40 percent of new phone sales are smartphones, a
figure that will surely rise with the current holiday promotions. And a
recent report projects that by 2011 a majority of phones in the U.S.
will be connected smartphones that put PC-like functionalities in the palm of your hand.
"[S]martphone users are no longer just reading e-mail or
scheduling appointments but also surfing the Web, streaming video and
music, downloading games, and snapping pictures. Smartphones are now
seen more by consumers as minicomputers than as cell phones."
This is a giant step forward for U.S. connectivity and greatly
beneficial to American consumers, but it also raises key questions for
federal policymakers.
With the surge in smartphone adoption and mobile web usage, wireless data traffic in North America is expected to double every year between 2008 and 2013.
If this forecast holds true, it means that we are facing what FCC
Chairman Julius Genachowski calls a 'looming spectrum crisis.' The FCC
needs to take action by opening up new wireless spectrum. Thankfully,
Chairman Genachowski recognizes this challenge and is taking steps to
address it.
However, as we witnessed with the last auctions, the path to
spectrum allocation can be a lengthy and bureaucratic process, and
consumers also need more immediate solutions. Wireless network
management helps ensure as seamless a consumer experience as possible,
no matter how busy the wireless networks become. As we seek solutions
to address exponentially increasing mobile usage, we should keep in
mind the constructive policies and engineering practices that made this
growth possible in the first place.
As evidenced this Black Friday, wireless innovation is working for
America. When considering policy changes, the FCC must first do no
harm. Government policies should support mobile's still-nascent
potential and growth, but consumer choices and mobile innovation should
guide wireless' bright future.
Ever wondered what the place where you are standing looked like 200 years ago? Ever wonder what a far away object looks like up-close?
In just a couple of years our smartphones may be able to answer these questions for us. Technologists are developing "augmented reality" applications that can take visual information from the web and infer what our surroundings looked like in the past or give us more detailed views of distant objects.
Experts say smartphones of the near future may physically resemble the smartphones of today, but their capabilities will better resemble our computers. Designers and technologists predict that many phones will have foldable screens similar to e-readers of today. Researchers are even experimenting with virtual keyboards, which will allow users to type over an imaginary keyboard while sensors pick up the keystrokes.
Today's smartphones can do almost anything a PC could do in 2007, but in a couple of years smartphones may have enough computing power to enable much more sophisticated applications that truly take advantage of the device's portability.
This is good news for smartphone users. If you love your phone, but prefer your laptop keyboard and all its capabilities, it may not be too long before you've got the best of both worlds in one portable device.
The days of cutting class and burying bad tests at the bottom of the backpack may be over for many students in the Houston area. An article in the Houston Chronicle reports that schools are using technology to better inform parents about their children's education:
The majority of area school districts - Houston and Klein joined the ranks last month - now allow parents real-time online access to their children's grades, assignments and attendance reports. Parents can set up triggers that send e-mails or texts at the first sign of trouble.
For many parents these updates have become an invaluable tool: allowing them to stay updated on their children's education, while opening new lines of communication between parents, students and teachers. Parents are not only able to stay informed of how their children are doing, but also what they are learning - making those dinnertime "what did you learn in school today" conversations a little more productive.
Schools in Texas aren't the only ones to take advantage of wireless technology. Earlier this month a principal in Algonquin, Ill. gave his cell phone number to all 2,500 students at Jacobs High School during the morning announcements.
In his announcement, the principal asked all students and staff to text-message him anytime day or night with safety-related concerns or to report a school disruption. Some of those things could include knowledge of students with drugs, alcohol or weapons; gang-related activity; or a planned student fight on school property.
In a school where 90 percent of students send text messages, Principal Michael Bregy says the idea has helped foster a safe learning environment and let him connect with students in a way that they feel comfortable with.
Many schools and universities throughout the nation also use text messages as a way of informing students and parents of emergencies and cancellations. Texts have been used to inform parents of cancellations because of inclement weather and to give students real-time instructions in potential emergency situations.
Such messages are not only a convenience and a better way of staying informed, but also an example of how mobile technology has become a vital means of keeping students safe and improving education.
It's great to see so many schools using wireless technology to benefit students. We're excited to see what kind of innovative ideas educators will come up with next.
Mobile Future Chairman Jonathan
Spalter just published a Huffington post entry that
discusses the wireless catch 22 of extending proposed net neutrality rules to
the wireless industry at a time when we are facing a looming spectrum crisis.
With mobile data traffic growing at 100 times the rate of
wireless voice traffic, a serious supply-demand imbalance is headed our way -
one that can only be relieved by government leadership to make more spectrum
available to keep pace with consumer demand. The technological and policy
quandary? How to address this profound and pressing national need, while at the
same time asserting that we have to potentially make the crisis worse by fixing
these fast-evolving networks with what are widely viewed as unworkable
engineering mandates.
What's the solution - long-term strategies and data-driven decision-making. Read more about Jonathan's suggestions in the
article here.
Remember Blu-Ray vs. HD DVD? How about Beta vs. VHS?
For anyone who gets frustrated when industries can't agree on consumer product standards, this is good news: Mobile users who want to stream TV won't have to deal with annoying format disputes.
"Manufacturers and broadcasters had already been moving forward with the preliminary technical standard for Mobile Digital Television, but now the standard has been finalized by the Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC).
"Friday's formal announcement of the standard adoption by ATSC means that everyone can move forward knowing that the technical specs are set in stone."
Look at how fast this is progressing. In January, not a single local TV station beamed mobile phone-ready video. By mid-summer, mobile users in Raleigh, NC and Washington, DC became the first to enjoy mobile TV and by year's end, consumers in nearly 30 of the nation's top markets will have this option.
"Augmented reality" apps that meld the virtual and actual world are popping up for everything from dining choices to sightseeing narratives. These applications marry a phone's GPS and compass features with access to high-speed wireless networks to provide users with local Web content.
The first phones with Google's Android operating system, which enables augmented reality, have come out in the past year. The iPhone debuted a compass app in June, and Apple recently joined Google in making it possible for software developers to overlay images on the phone's camera view. And other companies are following suit.
Amsterdam-based Layar recently released an augmented reality browser for Android phones. Layar lets you search for things on Google, but delivers the results based on your location as determined by the GPS readout. Users also can sign up to have certain types of information automatically appear on phone screens. The company is working on a 3-D function that it hopes to release in November.
Another "augmented reality" leader is Yelp, a Web site with business reviews written by customers. After the iPhone got a compass, Yelp created Monocle, an app allowing information to overlay onto a real-time view of the world. Built by a Yelp intern, Monocle combines the iPhone's camera view with tiny tags indicating the names, distances and user ratings of proximate businesses.
And then there is Robotvision, a 99-cent program built by Portland, Ore.-based developer Tim Sears. Hold your phone parallel to the ground and Robotvision displays a map of your surroundings. Hold the phone up, and Robotvision hits augmented-reality, highlighting places like coffee shops and bars.
Sure, there are some issues hindering augmented reality apps. There are technological limitations - cell phones need to be more powerful, cameras and graphics improved, and GPS more precise. But, as cell phones get even smarter and GPS and wireless networks improve, consumers may be spending more time in a virtually enhanced world.
The Houston Chronicle
recently printed an op-ed from Mobile Future Board Member Art
Contreras. The piece
reviews Mobile Future's latest white paper on mobile broadband
usage in the Hispanic community. Art is a Texas native and Houston local who served in the Houston Police
Department for 36 years and was U.S. Marshal for the Southern District of Texas
from 1998 to 2002.
"As a Hispanic-American, I am proud
our community is leading the way in wireless adoption, and I'm excited to see
how this adoption can be applied to bolster the community as a whole - from
entrepreneurial opportunities and health care to education and law
enforcement."
In addition sharing his thoughts on wireless usage in the Hispanic
community, Art also discusses how wireless technology can assist public safety
officials in keeping communities safe. You can read Art's op-ed here.
Not long ago, the wireless rule at many hospitals could be summed up in one word: No. No cell phones. No pagers. No PDAs.
How times have changed. As Telephony Online reports this week, many hospitals are now "wide-open wireless environments, with multiple types of wireless networks co-existing to provide anywhere communications and real-time delivery of medical testing data and telemetry."
Take Methodist Healthcare in San Antonio, where a wireless intranet is going up at six hospitals. As the hospital's CIO told Telephony, "Our doctors and nurses need tools that are wireless.... If a nurse needs to reach a doctor with a question when she is administering some medication and that doctor is walking the halls of the hospital, wireless is the only way to reach him."
FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski made news today
announcing his intent to open a regulatory inquiry into the merits of
imposing so-called 'net neutrality' rules on the wireless sector. The
move adds another high-stakes conversation on top of a broad inquiry
into the future of wireless and the methodical, inclusive march toward
a national broadband plan.
At first glance, the announcement appears to be a populist
slam-dunk. The term 'net neutrality' has no agreed-upon definition in
policy circles. But in popular culture, it has become synonymous with
free speech. And, whether you watch Fox News or read Huffington Post,
that's one issue virtually all Americans can agree on.
Momentum is clearly building for greater regulation of wireless and
broadband. But as we wade deeper into these issues and contemplate
changing the environment that has led to such rapid and profound
innovation today, it is worth thinking through the possible
implications to consumers, innovators and our economy.
As we do so, here are three areas that should be foremost in policymakers' minds:
Consumer experience. The notion that all
applications and websites are created equal has an appealing,
egalitarian ring to it. It's proven a reasonably workable concept for
wired broadband networks. But it poses the risk of potentially
calamitous disruption to the wireless consumer experience.
Wireless and wired broadband networks are very different both
technically and operationally. In fact, a primary reason mobile has
exploded over the past decade is precisely because these networks are
prudently managed. When's the last time, for example, your mobile
device was overcome by viruses? Yes, many want mobile devices with
endlessly customizable options - and the marketplace certainly delivers
a wide array of choices - but most consumers also take the technology
for granted and want to connect to people and information without a
second thought.
In a world where streaming video is becoming more common, an 'all
bits are created equal' decree could run a fairly extreme risk of
degrading the wireless experience of many to accommodate the mobile
content habits of a few. Available spectrum is finite. Capacity must
continually be managed in a dynamic way. Do we really want the FCC to
be not only the regulators of wireless networks, but also its engineers
and network managers?
The Commission likely will carve out a few obvious exceptions. One
would hope, for example, that we can agree that real-time health
monitoring should take precedence over a neighbor's kid downloading the
latest Hannah Montana movie. But the most exciting innovations often
come from unexpected - and thus unanticipated - places. Who knew that
the number of mobile applications downloaded on just one brand - iPhone
- would exceed one billion in its very first year? Regulations can
confine mobile's vast potential in ways we cannot easily predict today
and will likely underestimate to our detriment.
Investment. We all know what happens when too many
cars pile onto the freeway. One obvious solution is to build more
lanes. This takes billions of dollars in investment. The most
compelling argument I've heard on this front, came from a small
Internet provider in Wyoming. 'I'm all for free speech,' he said, 'but
I'm not for free beer.' His point: Given that we all are free to
express ourselves on-line and off, any new regulations must carefully
balance the broad public interest in keeping robust investment flowing
into these networks. Free beer and free speech are both wildly populist
notions. But only one makes for constructive, sustainable policy.
Of course, the stakes go well beyond the ISPs to consumers and the
broader mobile innovation community. Both depend on robust,
well-managed networks to deliver a quality experience that fuels demand
for not only more bandwidth, but exciting new uses for it.
Innovation. One negative outcome would be
regulations that are far from neutral. Let's be honest: vested
interests exist on both sides of the net neutrality fence. The FCC
needs to find a balanced path forward - one that ends the divisive
debate about whether the government should allow innovation at the edge
or in the networks. Clearly, we need both to keep pace with consumers
and make the most of mobile innovation.
We are in a technology environment where the demands placed on wireless
networks are increasing exponentially. This is a good thing for mobile
innovation because it means we are delivering new and diverse consumer
benefits on a much broader scale. To keep the innovation flowing, we
need policies that clearly comprehend that network management is
central to this ongoing progress.
Agree or disagree on this one divisive policy issue, I believe that
all wireless stakeholders share a genuine commitment to encouraging
innovation, investment, as well as diversity of content, services and
applications. As we take a closer look at how we achieve these goals,
we should resist a rush to judgment. Through 20-plus years of
Democratic and Republican Administrations, entrepreneurs, innovators
and consumers have driven mobile innovation and growth.
Increased and imprudent government intervention could cut short an
extraordinary run that has delivered real consumer, social and economic
benefits, and has the promise of doing even more in the days and months
ahead. The risk of unintended consequences could derail so many
positive advances and opportunities underway. Are we taking a
constructive step forward or walking the plank on mobile innovation?
Only time - and the quality, balanced nature of the coming
deliberations - will tell.
In 2007, approximately 14 million Americans recycled their used cell phones, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Environmentally-conscious consumers and companies are leading the charge to reduce America’s e-waste.
In recent years, wireless users have become a favorite target for new state and local taxes. Today, state and local taxes and fees average about 14 percent of consumers’ mobile phone bills.
0 comments | Permalink